August 17, 2021
Afghanistan altered in the blink
of an eye this week. Young Afghans who grew up in the aftermath of the 9/11
attacks will pay the highest price: despite the government's corruption and
inefficiencies, the decades afterwards have seen historically extraordinary
improvements in education, employment, and wages.
Women, who were frequently denied
an education and exposed to horrible human rights violations under the Taliban,
reaped the greatest benefits. Their aspirations and dreams have now been
dashed. The Afghan people, however, will not be the only ones who will be
affected. But how could this happen? What would the Taliban's Islamic Emirate's
revival mean for India, the region, and the rest of the world?
WAS THE TALIBAN'S SUCCESS AN
INTELLIGENCE FAILURE?
Kabul was expected to hold out
for at least four weeks, according to US officials less than a week ago. They
had previously predicted that the Taliban would take months to overrun major
Afghan cities. Before that, they claimed that the Taliban would never be able
to take control Afghanistan. These judgments, according to experts, either
constitute a remarkable intelligence failure or a willful deception aimed at
facilitating American disengagement.
Nobody should have been
surprised, to be honest. Since the United States and its partners halted combat
operations in 2014 — while they continued to use air power — the Taliban have
progressively taken larger swaths of rural land. In 2017, the Afghan Army's 215
Corps, stationed in Helmand, was on the verge of collapsing, necessitating the
US to send in troops, ostensibly on a "training" mission.
The Taliban gradually encircled
the major towns, capturing distant rural districts. The process quickened
drastically this summer, after the United States began withdrawing its
remaining soldiers and curtailed air strikes against the Taliban.
DO YOU THINK THE AFGHAN ARMY GAVE
UP WITHOUT A FIGHT?
Although Afghan government troops
numbered about 3,50,000, more than half of them were made up of
poorly-disciplined, ill-trained, and frequently corrupt militia and police
forces. The army was only 1,85,000 strong, with just about 60% of them being
combat men. The army had to be dispersed among nearly 10,000 small outposts and
checkpoints to secure the country's cities and towns, which were linked by an
at best shaky road network.
In contrast, the Taliban could
focus its 60,000 core forces and 90,000 militia on hit-and-run operations.
The Afghan military could
overcome some of these difficulties if it had the support of air force.
However, the United States' quick pullout left the Afghan Air Force without the
majority of its maintenance contractors, who were largely Americans.
Second, the Afghan armed forces
lacked the capability to strike the Taliban's supply and training bases beyond
the Pakistani border. It didn't even have troops on the border to keep
infiltration at bay. Consider the following figures: Over 3,20,000 Indian army
soldiers are stationed in Jammu and Kashmir, which is one-third the strength of
India's army, one third the size of Afghanistan.
WHAT DOES THE RESURRECTION OF THE
TALIBAN'S ISLAMIC EMIRATE MEAN FOR INDIA?
In the short term, the
consequences are unlikely to be severe: despite the fact that India's borders
on the map extend to Afghanistan, Pakistan-occupied Kashmir stands in the
middle of the two countries, providing a geographical buffer. Pakistan has
reduced cross-border infiltration by terrorist groups in recent years, not
because of Afghanistan, but because it is afraid of war, which its economy is
ill-prepared to meet. Things in Kashmir will remain steady as long as Pakistan
keeps the jihadi tap shut.
THE FUTURE, ON THE OTHER HAND, IS
NOT SO CERTAIN.
First, according to many UN
reports, organisations such as Jaish-e-Muhammad and Lashkar-e-Taiba collaborate
with the Taliban. These organisations could extend their training camps and
bases in Afghanistan in the future, increasing their lethality and reach.
Despite pledges, the Taliban
continues to harbour al-Qaeda. Its main fighting branch, the Haqqani Network,
has close ties to an Islamic State wing that has trained and utilised Indian
nationals in suicide assaults.
Finally, just as the Mujahideen's
success over the Soviet Union inspired jihadists across the area a generation
ago, the Taliban's win will inspire jihadists across the region.
Advertisement
WILL THE TALIBAN'S SUCCESS
DESTRUCT THE REGION?
It's almost certain. Uzbek and
Tajik citizens who have been participating in Islamist insurgencies in Central
Asia are among the Taliban's fighting units in northern Afghanistan. Jihadists
from Xinjiang, China, have ties to the Taliban. It also has a substantial
number of jihadists who have vehemently anti-Shia sentiments among its ranks.
To make matters worse, the Taliban has established tight ties with drug
traffickers and other criminal groups.
Pakistan, too, has reason to be
concerned. Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, which has conducted a violent insurgency
against Pakistan and continues to stage terrorist attacks in Pakistan's
Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province, maintains close ties to the Taliban. In Pakistan,
the TTP has also targeted Chinese interests.
Islamabad has always been the
Taliban's major supporter — but now that it has what it wants, the Taliban will
likely try to use its ties with the TTP to obtain more decision-making power.
The regional powers – Iran,
Russia, China, and Pakistan - backed the Taliban in the hopes of driving the US
out of the region and ensuring their own interests. But it's anyone's guess how
long this partnership will last.
ARE THERE ANY CARDS LEFT FOR
INDIA TO PLAY?
Since 9/11, India has donated $2
billion in aid to Afghanistan – a pittance in comparison to the US's roughly $2
trillion investment, but not insignificant either, given that the US's own
spending on governance and development was only about $36 billion. The Salma
Dam in western Afghanistan, the Delaram-Zaranj highway, and Afghanistan's — now
defunct — Parliament building are among the notable investments.
Some of these investments, such
as those made in Iran's Chabahar port, the hub of a trade corridor that freed
Afghanistan from Karachi's chokehold, may give New Delhi some power. For
obvious reasons, the Taliban will not want to be fully reliant on Pakistan.
New Delhi, on the other hand, is
currently cut off from the rest of the world. India supported the anti-Taliban
Northern Ties in the run-up to 9/11, but it could only do so because of its
alliance with Iran and Russia. Those countries are now on the other side of the
world. Even then, India was unable to prevent the Taliban's victory; only 9/11
was able to do so. It also drew the wrath of the terrorist organisation, which
was reflected in the Taliban's backing for the hijackers of an Indian Airlines
flight to Kandahar.
Now, the best course of action
for New Delhi could be to wait on the sidelines and observe the game till an
opportunity arises.
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR AMERICA'S
GLOBAL POSITION?
The United States' exit from
Afghanistan comes as it prepares for a more serious confrontation with China, a
developing powerhouse. Indeed, one of the reasons in favour of Afghanistan
withdrawal was that it would free up resources for a far more crucial — from an
American perspective — strategic fight.
The lessons from Afghanistan, on
the other hand, will not be encouraging for smaller Asian countries considering
their alternatives. Some will wonder if the US is truly willing to protect
allies in distress. Are the promises it makes genuine? Is it willing to put up
a fight?
The main result is that support
for open-ended military engagements abroad is dwindling in the United States,
and it is likely to dwindle even further in the future. This is the first
generation of young Americans in a century to confront the prospect of becoming
poorer than their parents in actual terms. Young Americans are in debt at
never-before-seen amounts.
Despite the fact that the United
States is the world's most powerful economic and technological power, it will
be far more inward-looking than in the past.
Advertisement
Source: CNN